2.4 the main idea beyond this picture is to show different scales. This helps me think about different scales just how they are arranged starts out at the bottom most detailed working up higher to get to the top as the biggest area that is the least detailed. It helps me think of scales and powers of ten and reading   Braudel is that they increase slightly and they all have different levels of organization in each scale.

The graph starts out vivid but detailed then it goes up to get more expanding and less detailed. Yes the last sentence I just did makes me think of scales because of the the vast categories and how it is organized. Yes i have the Japan bomb dropping in ww2 the area of explosion we looked at direct impact and going further out. You can look at direct and look at what would happen 1 mile away and further distances. No I didn't expire nice any difficulties. 

Part 2.1 What David is trying to get acrossed is that when you look at things at different scales you then you get different answers for each scale. For example the picnic level or normal level is different the 1000 light years away. And how a single carbon atom mis diffrent from that compared to 100000 light years.

The main ideas is that diffrent scales you view the more vast and detailed they are. So if you look at the earth you get a bigger idea and less details also vice versa. 

I had the same ideas from the powers of ten essay and the scales essay.

It extends my learning on how I can view diffrent things on diffrent scales in both the past and the present do know diffrent areas of importance of diffrent things

2.2 he uses scales in his two essays but he is focoused more on the surface  or the vast things not really teenie tiny details like the powers of ten does. 

I think he does agree with David in some ways more than other David is more dead set on accuracy I think where fernand is more set on the surface like the picnic level almost not going down to the nano or microscopic level just normal. 

I think they do support each other views but their thought processes vary because no one thinks Alike fernand didn't want to go as in depth as David did

He would have stopped at 2 because he didn't want to go too small of detail but not in great depth either

Part 2: the advantages of looking same object from different distances can be good. These are good because up close you can notice some things you may have never seen before. Theses are also good because these can help your recognizes how small or big something is. A good example of what I said in sentence three would be the earth compared to our sun is gigantic and our sun compared to VY Canis Majoris our sun is literally one pixel. From. A shorter distance you can see more clearly than you would at a farther distance like on those green highway signs the farther you are away from them the harder they are to read when you get closer you can see them perfectly.

Part 1:  We study history on many different scales to understand history and know the precise details. We study the universe to get a better Idea of how we began 13.7 billion years ago. We study ur DNA to show how we evolved from the most primitive creatures to who we are today. What I noticed in our raisin picture of how small the earth us compared to our sun. And where the sun was it was hard to see it from the end of the hall where the raisin and baseball were.

Story url http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2483623760748983937#editor/target=post;postID=7645512065380094901;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=1;src=postname

Bhp response number 2

Origin storys help us to better understand where we came from
I think it really depends on opinion like some people believe that the big bang created the earth and some believe god created the world some people might have more belief of science creating the eArth and some may have more belief that god created it